|
Blood on Fianna Fail’s Carpet
By John Spain
IT’S been an interesting week here in politics, even though officially
all our politicians are on holidays. Behind the scenes, however, there’s
a lot going on.
As you will remember, Fianna Fail got a hiding in the local elections
recently and, if that performance were repeated in the general election
due in two years or so, then the party would lose power. Instead of a
historic third term in office, Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Bertie Ahern
and his merry men would be out of government. Not only that, a lot of
Fianna Fail backbenchers would lose their well-paid seats in the Dail
(Parliament).
This prospect provoked near panic in the party. To calm the troops, Ahern
promised a shake-up in policy and a radical reshuffle of his Cabinet so
that the party could turn around the situation before the next election.
That reshuffle is to happen next month. Hence all the jockeying for position
that is going on behind the scenes at the moment.
Previous promises by Ahern to shake up his team have not come to much.
No one expected the two oldest Cabinet members, Agriculture Minister Joe
Walsh and Defense Minister Micheal Smith, to be reappointed after the
last election, since both are in their sixties. But the ever-cautious
Ahern, who will do anything to protect his nice guy image, could not bring
himself to fire them.
At least in public. There are various ways of skinning a cat, of course.
Just how deadly Ahern can be behind the cuddly image was seen recently
when Minister for Finance Charlie McCreevy was persuaded to take the job
of Irish Commissioner in Europe, in spite of saying all along he did not
want it.
Ahern says that McCreevy was not pushed, that he was the best man for
the European job and so on. But no one believes it. McCreevy had a choice
— either take the job or risk being moved out of finance in the
reshuffle, which would be seen as a demotion.
The shafting of McCreevy came after Ahern had held individual private
meetings with all his Fianna Fail back benchers, who blamed McCreevy’s
conservative economic policy and tight control of government spending
as the reason for the hammering the party had got in the vote.
He had to change or go, they said. The government purse strings had to
be loosened.
So the unthinkable happened. Ahern dumped his buddy McCreevy, while heaping
praise on him in public. It sent shivers up the spines of the rest of
the Cabinet.
And last week, bowing to the inevitable, Minister for Agriculture Joe
Walsh announced that he will be stepping down from the Cabinet in September.
The cynics said that he went before he was pushed too. And certainly there
was little or no chance that he would have been reappointed in the reshuffle.
Defense Minister Smith, who knows his time is up, is still hanging in
there, but all eyes are on him to see if he will make a dignified exit
as well. If he does not, the axe will fall next month.
This will leave Ahern with three senior Cabinet posts vacant for his reshuffle,
which the minimalist Bertie would probably consider a radical shakeup.
But is three enough?
If he is to convince the uneasy Fianna Fail backbenchers that a genuine
new start is being made he probably needs to shift four or five senior
ministers rather than just three. There will be even more blood on the
Fianna Fail carpet before this is over.
On policy, there is no easy answer to the dilemma Ahern faces. It was
our low tax regime that nurtured the Celtic Tiger.
Now Fianna Fail wants to spend its way back into power, by throwing money
at problem areas like health. But you can’t have high spend and
low tax at the same time, unless we’re to go back to the bad old
days of high state borrowing. And that, as we all learned in the 1970s
and ‘80s, is the road to ruin.
Apart from state spending, the other big area that Ahern will have to
get to grips with is prices. Of course it is wonderful that our economy
is continuing to grow at an impressive rate. But there is a downside to
this, with the price of everything now soaring to insane levels.
Basic items are very much part of this syndrome. Supermarket groups with
stores on both sides of the border are now charging their southern customers
an average of 14% more than their northern customers for exactly the same
trolley of groceries.
A survey has revealed some shocking disparities. One popular brand of
cookies is 60% cheaper in the North than in the same supermarket chain
in the south.
Supermarkets have always explained differences revealed in price surveys
between here and Britain or Europe by the high cost of transporting goods
to our island nation. But it costs just as much to bring goods to the
North as it does to the south, so why the yawning price gap? It is hard
to avoid the conclusion that profiteering must be a factor.
The problem is that the boom here has pushed our wages and costs way up,
which at least partly explains why prices are so high here now. Through
the ‘90s our inflation has been higher than in the U.K.
Wages in the south now are much higher than in the North, for example.
Which may partly explain the difference in supermarket prices between
north and south.
But only partly. The rest is blatant profiteering. And it’s not
just the supermarkets who are at it.
The price of everything has gone through the roof, including services
of all kinds. Call a plumber or an electrician here and even the smallest
job ends up costing a fortune.
So prices are a big issue here now with voters. There’s a feeling
that things are out of control. Which is the reason why the main opposition
party, Fine Gael, last week called for the introduction of a new prices
ombudsman to crack down on the rip-off merchants who now fleece the consumer
on a daily basis.
But it’s a complicated issue. Fine Gael is not calling for the new
prices enforcer to actually set prices. They still want the market and
supply and demand to do that.
But they are saying that we need an independent consumer rights enforcer
with power to name those charging high prices in media ads and to impose
heavy fines for non-display of price lists in pubs, petrol stations and
retail outlets. That’s a long way from actual price control.
In Ireland we already have a Competition Authority to stop cartels like
supermarkets, petrol retailers and others from acting together to fix
prices. And we already have a director of consumer affairs, with the job
of making sure that quality, guarantees and other consumer rights are
honored.
But we do not have any agency with the job of actually fixing prices,
for the very good reason that doing so may not be possible in a free economy,
no matter how much we might all like to have the rip-off stopped.
But the idea of having a powerful new office conducting regular price
surveys, highlighting good value and naming and shaming those charging
too much in a big publicity campaign, is a good one. It just might work.
Of course the biggest problem facing us is something we can do absolutely
nothing about — the price of oil. For most people in Ireland the
car is a necessity rather than a luxury, and rising fuel costs are not
something that can be avoided.
But it is the wider effect of soaring oil prices that is the main concern.
Our economy is heavily dependent on oil, with so much of our goods being
transported by truck and our exports carried in oil-powered ships, having
been produced from oil-powered electricity in the first place.
Even a small increase in oil prices has a significant knock-on effect
on our economy. A global economic downturn could cause us major problems.
Oil prices have risen by more than a third since the end of 2003 and there
are fears that they could soon reach $50 a barrel, with serious repercussions
for the global economy and for Ireland.
So Ahern needs to be careful. We are all in favor of improving state services
like health.
But throwing around a lot of money in the next year or two — and
there is no guarantee that doing so will produce the required improvement
— may not be the best path for Ireland in these uncertain times,
no matter how much Fianna Fail wants to stay in power.
|